Shared decision making allows room for open communication between the patient and his healthcare provider, wherein interaction and change of ideas mostly take place as they the decision-making is processed. What’s involved during this process is the provision of an informed consent by the patient to what, when and how the treatment should be implemented, and eliciting realistic outcome criteria for the planned treatment, preventing future conflicts between the patient and the care provider, encouraging and implementing autonomy on the part of the patient especially in making decisions pertaining to his health and explaining the risks and benefits during and after the treatment.
A shared decision-making is considered a good one and will most likely come up with a promising outcome if both parties, usually involves at least two participants (the health care provider and the patient, and sometimes the patient’s relatives take part in the process) are well-informed, which means that information is properly disseminated and the decision is based and reinforced with on hand substantiation, conforms with the patient’s beliefs and values, gives regard to the preferences of the patient, if the pros outweighs the cons, agreement is achieved on the decision of the planned treatment, and patient satisfaction is warranted after the decision has been made and treatment is executed.
Continue reading ‘Integrating Shared Decision Making in the Healthcare System’ »